Focused on winning overseas buyers for Chinese factories

I measure which sources AI and search cite for the sourcing questions in your category, break down what those suppliers have in common, and inventory the private facts available to you — capacity, equipment, tolerance range, certifications, delivered work — then estimate the content gap and time to result. An existing website is not a prerequisite.

• Competitiveness: what cited suppliers share, and your distance from it
• Build effort: content gap, time to result, order of magnitude
• Private-fact inventory: the raw material for everything that follows
• Technical and content audit, where a site already exists
• Verdict: whether it merits the investment, and the first move

Each depends on the others: off-site work creates exposure, on-site content lets a buyer judge capability, the site captures the inquiry. Remove one and the spend leaks at the next step. Delivered as one engagement, and measured on one outcome.

• Website build or rebuild, with rebuilds preferred over replacements
• Specs, tolerances, equipment lists and certifications, restructured and marked up
• Directories, association listings, B2B databases, trade-media contributions
• Monthly review across traffic, AI citations and inquiries
• Measured in inquiry volume, not in content output

Suited to factories whose site already persuades: product pages carry specs, certifications and delivered work, and the gap is exposure alone. Where the site falls short, off-site work will not convert into inquiries; I say so at the diagnosis and decline the engagement.

• Directory, association and B2B database listings
• Trade media and technical forum contributions
• No paid links, no private blog networks
• Monthly re-measurement of citations and traffic, reproducible
• Measured in exposure and citations; inquiries are not promised